Guest Post: Another One Bites the Dust

by Jack Drescher, MD
A recent article in Scientific American by Thomas Maier has cast into doubt the veracity of a study published 30 years ago that purported to demonstrate that some people can change their homosexual orientation to a heterosexual one.
The study in question was carried out by the most pre-eminent American sex researchers of [...]

London: Nicolosi Peddles Same Old Gay, Ex-Gay Myths

Reparative therapist Dr Joseph Nicolosi used a conference in London yesterday to recycle a host of offensive myths about gay men.
According to David Virtue, who describes his notoriously anti-gay website as “the global voice for orthodox Anglicanism,” Nicolosi “ripped” gay organizations for promoting a “lifestyle” that is “ultimately pathological, narcissistic, self-absorbed and offers no hope [...]

UK: One in Six Therapists Has Offered Reparative Therapy

A survey has found that 17 percent of therapists in the UK have offered a client therapy to “reduce” same-sex attractions. Four percent said they would try to “change” a patient’s sexuality if asked.
The findings are from a study carried out by a team at University College London, whose ongoing research into conversion therapy is [...]

PFOX Misrepresents Research to Defame Gays

A scientist has accused Parents and Friends of ExGays and Gays (PFOX) of distorting his research by claiming that high school gay-straight alliances increase risk of suicide for teens.
PFOX President Regina Griggs said that “the risk of suicide decreases by 20% each year that a person delays homosexual or bisexual self-labeling,” and criticized schools for [...]

Dr Patrick Chapman Responds to Drs Jones And Yarhouse

Dr. Chapman gives his concluding remarks in a series which began with his three part critique of Ex-gays?: A Longitudinal Study of Religiously Mediated Change in Sexual Orientation by Dr Stanton Jones and Dr Mark Yarhouse. What follows is a response to the author’s comments on the original critique. We thank all three [...]

Response to Dr. Patrick M. Chapman’s Critique of ‘Ex-Gays’ – Part 3

Response to Part 3 of Dr. Patrick M. Chapman’s Review of “Ex-Gays”, posted on Ex-Gay Watch, November, 2007, by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A. Yarhouse.
Response to “Part 3: A Focus on the Results — Examining if it is Harmful”
In this final response, Chapman raises a number of interesting questions, but again continues 1) [...]

Response to Dr. Patrick M. Chapman’s Critique of ‘Ex-Gays’ – Part 2

Response to Part 2 of Dr. Patrick M. Chapman’s Review of “Ex-Gays”, posted on Ex-Gay Watch, November, 2007, by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A. Yarhouse.

Response to “Part 2: A Focus on the Results — Examining if Change is Possible”
Here in Part 2 Dr. Chapman’s criticisms turn more severe. First he asserts that [...]

Response to Dr. Patrick M. Chapman’s Critique of ‘Ex-Gays’ – Part 1

Response to Part 1 of Dr. Patrick M. Chapman’s Review of “Ex-Gays”, posted on Ex-Gay Watch, November, 2007, by Stanton L. Jones and Mark A. Yarhouse.

The greatest compliment that be paid to any work of scholarship is for it to receive serious consideration and generate discussion. Thus, we are pleased to see the review [...]

A Critique of Jones And Yarhouse’s ‘Ex-gays?’ – Part 3

A guest post By Patrick M. Chapman, PhD
Continued from Part 2
A Focus on the Results — Examining if it is Harmful
The American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric Association regard attempts to change sexual orientation as “potentially” harmful or risky. However, Jones and Yarhouse misrepresent the American Psychological Association as saying that such involvement “would be” [...]

A Critique of Jones And Yarhouse’s ‘Ex-gays?’ – Part 2

A guest post By Patrick M. Chapman, PhD
Continued from Part 1

A Focus on the Results — Examining if Change is Possible
In the opening chapter Jones and Yarhouse honestly and correctly state this study cannot establish if long-term, permanent and enduring change occurs because that would require a long-term study (p. 17). Contrarily, they later suggest [...]