Comments on: PFOX declares war on Mickey Mouse!

By: Yuki Choe

Yuki Choe — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 04:51:30 +0000

However, our mindless opposition just do not have the facts like we do. We know what sexual orientation is. They do not know. To them, gay or homosexuality is an adjective describing:

an addiction

a gross sex act

one of the many many “sexual orientations” behaviour like pedophilia

sex with same sex because of distant or overbearing parents

(if only they would make up their mind)

… and not a noun describing sexual attractions like we know it

By: KZ

KZ — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:13:42 +0000

I just read the headline to this post and had a good laugh.

Well put, Chuck. I’ve always wanted to ask an ex-gay why he/she doesn’t just identify as straight. With the term ‘ex-gay’ there is still that association with ‘gay’ since the word ‘gay’ is in the name. Samething goes for ‘former homosexual’ or ‘ex-homosexual.’

I wonder what it’s like to have a ‘holiness’ orientation.

By: Patrick Fitzgerald

Patrick Fitzgerald — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:31:59 +0000

So, doesn’t that mean holiness is a sexual orientation?

Way to thicken the plot.

By: Ephilei

Ephilei — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:42:12 +0000

3: If not heterosexual or homosexual or bisexual, do you see yourself as “asexual?”

Ex-lesbian Sarah Melnychuck informs me that many asexuals like myself “have walked out of homosexuality as well as asexuality” so apparently asexuality is sinful too. Although the APA considers asexuailty to be an orientation, lots of people do not. But I’m not worried about being disciminated against for being asexual, so I don’t care much.

By: Richard Rush

Richard Rush — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:39:28 +0000

Chuck, perhaps we need a fourth question. Alan Chambers says that "the opposite of homosexuality is not heterosexuality, it’s holiness." So, doesn't that mean holiness is a sexual orientation? If you no longer see yourself as homosexual, do you self-identify as holy?

By: Regan DuCasse

Regan DuCasse — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:13:08 +0000

Way to go Chuck!

This is making PFOX look supremely stupid. So focused are they on being victims, they are losing sight of the very issue.

Gay people have essentially worked hard at protections that eventually will include EVERYONE.

PFOX is being redundant, as Chuck has so smartly pointed out. They have worked against gay people, but now want to shove aside gay people and claim protections from something they’ve never supported.

The dichotomy and illogic of bigotry rears itself again!

By: Patrick Fitzgerald

Patrick Fitzgerald — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:54:27 +0000

1: If you are “ex-Gay,” does this mean that you are now Straight?

2: If not Straight, do you see yourself as a celibate homosexual?

3: If not heterosexual or homosexual or bisexual, do you see yourself as “asexual?”

That just about sums it up, Chuck. : )

By: Chuck Anziulewicz

Chuck Anziulewicz — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:31:01 +0000

Every time the self-proclaimed “ex-Gays” start bitching about how they are somehow being discriminated against, I am left scratching my head. Anti-discrimination laws are being expanded to include “sexual orientation.” And the funny thing about sexual orientation is, EVERYBODY HAS ONE.

To someone who describes himself as “ex-Gay,” I would ask the following questions:

1: If you are “ex-Gay,” does this mean that you are now Straight?

2: If not Straight, do you see yourself as a celibate homosexual?

3: If not heterosexual or homosexual or bisexual, do you see yourself as “asexual?”

Inquiring minds want to know!