The sad thing is that most homophobes and bigots are so determined to believe Cameron’s lies, they can’t even begin to remotely consider that what he says is not the gospel truth. If they did so….it would shatter their entire belief system.

The reality is the ex-gay ministry is based on a package of lies, the greatest being what Chambers states as “the opposite of homosexuality is holiness.”

The presidential election is another example of how negative attitudes towards women are still alive and well. Hilary Clinton was perceived as a cold-hearted, rigid, self-serving person because she didn’t do an impression of June Cleaver. I remember the news coverage making such a big deal over her and how they would imply she was not “feminine” as if she was “acting like a man.” They never went out and said it in those terms, but the underlining message was clear.

Back in the 80s, when my dad owned an extermination company, he hired a woman for pest control services. There were customers who refused to allow her to service their home. They told my dad that she should be in the office as a secretary or something, not as a pest control technician.

What really got my goat about Paul Cameron in this clip is how he is saying to let women seduce Bruno. What??? Hello??? Pat, I’d like to solve the puzzle (Wheel of Fortune pun). Isn’t premarital sex a no-no in Mr. Cameron’s religious world? My friends who grew up in the Evangelical spectrum of Christianity have told me horror stories of how they were drilled and killed over NOT having sex before marriage. How they would burn in the hottest pit of hell if they “deflowered” a woman before her wedding day.

I guess the worst “sin” for Mr. Cameron is being gay, and doing “lesser sins” is ok if it gets you out of “the homosexual lifestyle.” I am amazed he doesn’t have some dumb grass without the “gr” therapy where, to “get back to being straight” the “patient” first gets seduced by “feminine” guys, then transvestites, then works his way to butch women, they gradually works his way to the “ideal” woman – the 50′s June Cleaver type.

Just last year I wrote about the anti-woman/anti-feminine posture that many ex-gay theorists and practitioners espouse. In this “struggle” they make it clear that they believe men are valuable and worthy to be saved while women are an after thought or simply part of the treatment to save the men (ie marriage)

From Women & the Ex-Gay Movement

For a while I have been considering how the Ex-Gay Movement is an anti-fem movement. Most of the participants in it are male with curriculum and treatment plans geared towards “male issues.” Many of the men involved have felt the need to “change” after years of taunting for being sissies. They learned both on the playground and from the pulpit that the world does not value feminized men.

The cornerstone teaching of nearly every ex-gay program takes a swipe at women while also reinforcing the belief that women must be subservient to men. What makes a boy gay? According to most of these ex-gay providers and proponents gay boys are a bi-product of an “overbearing mother.” This false teaching infers that once a woman usurps a man’s authority and no longer remains submissive, this transgressive act alters the natural order of the world thus misshaping a child.